Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Suspension Overturned for Riverside PD Officer

August 1, 2003 by Hien Nguyen

From: PORAC LDF
By: William J. Hadden, ESQ., 8/1/2003

The suspension of a veteran Riverside police officer has been overturned by an arbitrator. The officer was represented at all stages of the proceedings by Bill Hadden of Silver, Hadden & Silver.

Rick Prince was a highly respected Riverside officer for 13 years. He had numerous commendations, excellent personnel evaluations and no discipline in his file. But the department and the new Riverside Community Police Review Commission abruptly decided to put an end to that. It all started on May 9, 2001, when Prince and a trainee were on patrol, and began investigating a possible handicapped parking violation. For years, Prince had received widespread recognition for his dedication to alleviating the plight of the handicapped. He had developed a detailed, uniform approach to the enforcement of handicapped parking laws, and submitted same in writing to the department. He generated hundreds of thousands of dollars of revenue from the issuance of citations, all of which were enforced in the same way, without regard for age, race, ethnicity or sex. In fact, regardless of any extraneous circumstances whatsoever. Simply put, if someone parked unlawfully in a handicapped space, the person was cited and, if a handicapped placard was being improperly used, the violator was issued a misdemeanor citation, and the vehicle was towed.

On the day in question, Prince and his trainee observed a female who had parked in a handicapped zone but appeared to have no physical limitations. Prince instructed his trainee to make contact with the woman, who insisted that the placard belonged to her and that she did not deserve to be harassed by the police. When the placard registration was checked by the officers, the woman was forced to admit that she had lied, that the placard was not hers, and that she had no placard of her own. As with so many other violators he had encountered, Prince determined to cite her for the misdemeanor misuse of a handicapped placard, and to arrange to have her vehicle towed pursuant to the California Vehicle Code.

The driver, who was loud, accusatory and uncooperative from the outset, refused to provide the officers with a legible signature. When Prince, as per department practice, sought to obtain a thumbprint from her in lieu of arrest, she flailed her arms and attempted to pull away from him. Prince instinctively responded by grabbing her hand and placing it in a wrist lock, admonishing her that if she continued to resist the attempt to obtain the print that she would be arrested. She ultimately relented, received her citation, and was released.

Shortly thereafter, the department received a complaint from the woman’s husband (who was not present at the scene), suggesting that the officers had abused her because of her race or gender, alleging that she had been nothing but cooperative with them.

For reasons unknown, the department took almost a year to complete its investigation of the complaint, producing a minimal product replete with factual inaccuracies.

The Riverside Community Police Review Commission, a body whose supposed charge it is to fairly and independently evaluate disciplinary investigations of the police department, merely rubber-stamped the department’s factual errors and added some of its own.

The department modified its disciplinary proposal to accommodate the whims of the commission, and charged that Prince somehow deserved a suspension for applying a wrist lock to defend himself and to control the woman’s errant hand.

Prince appealed, and, after a two-day hearing, prevailed. Hearing officer Tom Angelo determined that the female motorist’s dishonesty at the scene, quickness to attribute racial or gender discrimination to the officers, failure to cooperate, and obnoxious behavior under cross-examination by Hadden, all contributed to a finding of unreliability. Under all the facts and circumstances, Angelo held, Prince violated no rule by trying to control a hand thrust near his face by someone who had shown a pattern of belligerence. Angelo ruled that Prince should never have been suspended, and that he was entitled to all lost wages and benefits, and the expungement of the action from his file.

For Prince, the road to vindication was a long and tedious one:

“All I did was what any other cop is trained to do, instinctively insure my own safety,” he said. “If a Citizen’s Review Board is going to have any credibility, it should investigate these cases more thoroughly, and become more educated in police procedures and training.”

Filed Under: Bulletins Prior to RLS Tagged With: William J. Hadden

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.