Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Sheriff’s Deputies Take Legal Aim at Oversight Ballot Measure

August 18, 2020 by Hien Nguyen

From: Bay City News Foundation
By: Jeremy Hay

The Sonoma County Deputy Sheriffs' Association on Monday charged that county supervisors broke state law in the way they placed a measure on November's ballot that would strengthen the watchdog office that oversees the Sheriff's Office.

The legal action - filed with the state Public Employment Relations Board - was the latest confrontation between law enforcement and the supervisors over the oversight ballot measure.

Sonoma County Sheriff Mark Essick last week told the supervisors he is considering legal action against the county over the same measure.

The deputies association's legal action on Monday aims to force supervisors to rescind or nullify the measure placed on the Nov. 3 ballot. Dubbed the Evelyn Cheatham Ordinance, the measure, if successful, would give the oversight office increased access to personnel records and camera footage from body cameras, among other new powers.

Key to the legal charge is that the ordinance would affect working conditions for deputies, ranging from how investigations are conducted to how disciplinary matters are handled, said Rocky Lucia, an attorney with the firm representing the association. Because of that, government codes required that the county meet and confer with the association before placing the measure on the ballot, which it didn't do, said Lucia, of Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, a San Francisco law firm.

"We are in support of efforts to increase the public's confidence in the Sheriff's Office and the law enforcement services it provides," Mike Vail, the association's president, said in a statement. "However, it takes both parties' willingness to communicate for a workable partnership and make this mutually-desirable goal a reality. We were never given any formal notice prior to the Board's passage of this ordinance."

That's the central legal argument the association is making against the measure and how it ended up on the ballot. The deputies' association says it only learned that the Board of Supervisors was considering the ordinance on Aug. 6, the day the board took up the issue. Supervisors, rushing to get the measure on the ballot by the Aug. 7 deadline, did not meet to confer about it with the association before they tackled the question of whether to put it on the ballot, said Lucia. That violated state labor laws about how employers have to deal with public employee unions, the association argues in its filing.

Sonoma County Counsel Bruce Goldstein said in an email Monday: "In passing the ordinance, the County Board of Supervisors acted well within its policy making authority and the county is very confident the Board's action will withstand legal review."

Goldstein added: "At this time we are reaching out to the Association to schedule a meeting to address the association's concerns, and the county is equally confident that those concerns will be addressed in a mutually satisfactory manner."

"The only remedy they can exercise to make this right is to pull it back off the ballot," said Lucia.

A divided Board of Supervisors last week rejected the sheriff's request to hire outside counsel to review his legal options against the measure. Essick is entitled to appeal that decision in court but hasn't said whether he will.

He said the ordinance, were it to pass, would violate laws governing how county funds are allocated and personnel records, among other legal flaws, and would hurt his ability to carry out his duties.

Filed Under: RLS In The News Tagged With: rockne-a-lucia-jr

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.