Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

San Joaquin County Probation Officers Association Staying Involved with Members

May 7, 2013 by Hien Nguyen

The San Joaquin County Probation Officers Association (SJCPOA) stepped into the labor arena on their own in 2006, having broken away from SEIU, and since that time they have become extremely active and aggressive in the representation of their Members. They joined PORAC and the LDF program prior to their breakaway, and started a long and positive relationship with RLS.

The first challenge was negotiating an entirely new MOU which was successful. A monthly labor management meeting was implemented and has been very successful in  resolving issues and creating a positive relationship with the Administration of the Department.

Since those early days we have negotiated two concessions deals based on the County’s budget woes.  As with any labor management relationship, not all is perfect, but as of this writing we have successfully resolved every grievance filed without going to the final step of arbitration or the Civil Service Commission.

Most recently, we have prevailed in two grievances with the County regarding seniority.  Currently the County has a practice of reducing seniority hours for an unsatisfactory evaluation. The reduction is determined by the length of the evaluation period. In other words, if the evaluation covered a period of six months, six months of seniority would be deducted from the employee. Step increases are based on hiring date, so if a member’s seniority is deducted for a six month period, for example, they may not get their next step increase until six months after they would normally have received it. You can imagine what losing six months of seniority could do to your career, especially during the layoffs of the last several years.

In the first instance, a Probation Officer III was demoted based on performance as determined by the Department. Demotion in and of itself is severe punishment. Imagine the Member’s surprise when receiving a notice from the County that due to an unsatisfactory evaluation, six months seniority was being deducted. Justin Buffington of RLS represented the Member during the IA and the Skelly. After receiving the letter noticing the Member of the seniority deduction, the POA contacted RLS.

The grievance filed was based on the premise that the punishment for the perceived non-performance was the demotion. As nothing was noted in the IA investigation or the Skelly regarding the loss of the seniority, we made the argument that it was discipline without due process. Our arguments were successful and the seniority hours were returned to the Member.

In the second and most recent incident, a Member failed to qualify at the quarterly range training and was placed on a remediation plan.  The Member successfully completed the remediation.  Unfortunately, the Member’s supervisor did an interim evaluation and rated the Member as unsatisfactory.  This interim evaluation, however, came in the middle of a six-month evaluation period in which the member received not only a satisfactory evaluation, but was rated as above standard in two of the five rated categories.

After receiving no satisfaction from the supervisor, the grievance advanced to the next step which involved contacting RLS. We filed a formal written grievance on behalf of the Member citing among other facts, that the unsatisfactory performance was remediated and completed within the given time and therefore should no longer be rated as unsatisfactory.  We also cited that the six month evaluation mentioned nothing about the interim evaluation and should have taken precedence over the interim evaluation.

For some unknown reason the County really dragged their feet on their response.  After reminding the County that their deadline was approaching and that we were prepared to go to the Civil Service Commission, the County requested an extension. The deadline was a Friday.  The following Monday morning, having heard nothing from the County, I was in the process of writing an email notification of our intent to carry the grievance to the next step when I received a telephone call. The County Human Resources Director called to apologize for not reaching me on Friday, and informed me that the County was in fact reinstating the Member’s seniority as they agreed that the six-month evaluation took precedence over the interim evaluation.

The Member involved in the second grievance wants to assure fellow members of the SJCPOA’s efforts.  It’s not often that these seemingly small victories are touted by local associations, but what goes on behind the scenes on behalf of all the members requires a great deal of time and sacrifice by the leadership.

Disclaimer: Case law and analysis can change over time. The information in this article is accurate as of the date the article was written and should not constitute legal advice. Always consult with an attorney.

Filed Under: Bulletins Tagged With: justin-e-buffington

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.