Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Roseville police union weighs action over contract stalemate

August 16, 2013 by Hien Nguyen

From: The Modesto Bee

Ed Fletcher 08/11/13

Engulfed in a war of words and a contract stalemate, the head of the union representing Roseville police officers says officers may need to become more politically aggressive to secure a palatable deal.

The 100-member unit has been working under the city-imposed “last, best and final” contract offer since May.

The primary area of disagreement was the city’s insistence that police officers pay the full employee contribution to their pension plans, which amounts to 9 percent of their salary.

Jerry Wernli, president of the Roseville Police Officers Association, said officers would find the increased pension costs more acceptable if they were phased in or were offset by attainable bonuses.

In contract lingo, “last, best and final” is a technical state of bargaining required before the employer can impose an unfulfilled contract’s provisions. The “posted conditions” stand until a contract agreement can be reached.

The terms imposed by the city do include a $181 increase in medical coverage, but overall they cut officer take-home pay $400 to $600 a month – saving the city $875,000 a year.

Roseville officers continue to be among the highest paid in Northern California.

While the city has expressed an interest in resuming bargaining, Wernli said his members have little desire to rehash the same failed arguments. In the weeks that followed the council’s 4-0 vote to impose conditions, the two sides exchanged sharply worded statements.

The union sent emails to city residents expressing shock that the city was “crying wolf” while “secretly hoarding $91 million in available revenue.” The message asked residents to express their disapproval to the mayor and council members.

That letter and a similarly worded press release prompted a July 19 response from Mayor Susan Rohan and City Manager Ray Kerridge, chiding the union for misrepresenting the facts.

Kerridge said “confusing and misleading information” has prompted inquiries from the public.

“Just because the city has money doesn’t mean it should spend it or spend it on salary increases,” he wrote in a point-by-point retort.

The $91 million referenced was not revenue, it’s money left in special funds for specific purposes, said Megan MacPherson, a city spokeswoman.

Wernli said this week that he stands by the email and the city should consider tapping those reserves.

“That is what reserves are for, bridging a gap until the economy becomes more viable,” Wernli said. “They have done it for other projects. They just don’t want to do it for labor costs.”

Rohan said in an interview that the city is making a sound fiscal decision by not using reserves to fund ongoing costs, such as payroll. She also defended the use of reserve accounts.

“We don’t run a city like I run my household with one checkbook,” said Rohan.

MacPherson said saving money on salaries was one of the strategies for closing the city’s structural deficit.

Since the 2010-11 fiscal year, the city has shrunk its budget deficit from $8.2 million to a projected shortfall of $3.1 million for the 2013-14 fiscal year.

“Roseville is really concerned about being good stewards of public funds,” she said. “When times are good we put savings aside. We’re not going to change our conservative fiscal approach. We are not out of the woods yet.”

The officers’ association is considering taking the fight to the ballot box.

“This has caused us to reassess how we do endorsements,” Wernli said. He said the two council members the union endorsed in the last election, Pauline Roccucci and Carol Garcia, have not been as friendly as they would like.

“It would be nice to have people who are friends in office, people who would listen to you,” Wernli said.

John Noble, a labor representative working for the unit, said officers have been forced to consider political action.

“The City Council’s actions actually encourage members to get more involved than they used to be,” he said.

Rohan said she’s disappointed with the union’s tough talk.

“I have no desire to have a war,” she said, “or give police officers the impression their work is not valued.”

Filed Under: RLS In The News Tagged With: john-noble

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.