Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

RLS Secures Major Victory in PERB Affirming Union Labor Rights

June 24, 2021 by Hien Nguyen

Yesterday, the Public Employment Relations Board (“PERB”) issued a decision voiding the vast majority of a recently enacted measure broadening the powers of an independent civilian law enforcement oversight body in Sonoma County.

The decision, Sonoma County Deputy Sheriffs’ Association, et al. v. County of Sonoma (2021) PERB Decision No. 2772 M, strongly affirms the labor rights of law enforcement associations to bargain proposed oversight schemes, and sends a clear message to law enforcement employers that collective bargaining rights matter – no matter the political moment.

For approximately five years, Sonoma County’s Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach (“IOLERO”) primarily audited Sheriff’s Office operations and internal investigations, and provided non-binding advice and recommendations on policies and procedures. However, in August of 2020, the County’s Board of Supervisors adopted a ballot measure for voter consideration for the November 2020 election seeking to significantly broaden IOLERO’s
oversight authority.

Specifically, the measure sought to afford IOLERO the authority to, among other things: independently investigate misconduct complaints against DSA members and make disciplinary determinations, independently subpoena DSA members for testimony and documents, directly access member personnel file information (to include prior complaints), and attend internal affairs interrogations.

The Sonoma DSA learned of the intentions of the Board of Supervisors through media reports a few days prior to the Board’s vote on the matter. Within 48 hours of the DSA becoming aware of the plan to advance the proposal to the ballot, RLS sent a strong objection letter to the County based upon the lack of compliance with the mandates of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, Government Code section 3500, et seq. (“MMBA”)

View Demand Letter

The County refused to comply with the DSA’s demand to meet and confer and placed the measure on the November ballot. The voters overwhelmingly adopted the measure.

As referenced in RLS’s demand letter of August 6th, the County never provided advance notice to the DSA nor the opportunity to meet and confer, obligations the County owed the DSA under the MMBA. Instead, and in response to the DSA’s demands to meet and confer, the County asserted it was “not in the community’s interest” to do so – an obvious reference to the politically-driven false narrative that law enforcement cannot regulate itself.

In an effort to hold the County accountable and protect the DSA’s bargaining rights, the DSA filed an unfair labor practice charge with PERB, alleging the County violated its obligations under the MMBA. Following the lead of the DSA, another law enforcement association filed its own charge, making the same allegations, three days later. The case was consolidated before PERB, and expedited for consideration. Somewhat unusually, the full PERB board heard and decided the matter.

PERB agreed with the DSA that the County violated the MMBA. Of note, PERB held that “taken together, [the amendments] establish a parallel investigative scheme for County peace officers. [The DSA has] a right to bargain before the County subjects employees they represent to such a parallel investigatory process…”

View PERB Decision

Remarkably, to remedy the County’s violations, PERB found no less than 12 provisions of the measure passed by the voters void – including those affording IOLERO the expanded authority to independently investigate, interrogate, and subpoena DSA members, and access their personnel files.

In short, the County’s interest in accommodating political agendas of elected officials was soundly defeated. The DSA and RLS secured a victory for all public employees by holding the County responsible for putting politics over the law.

View Press Release

Disclaimer: Case law and analysis can change over time. The information in this article is accurate as of the date the article was written and should not constitute legal advice. Always consult with an attorney.

Filed Under: Bulletins Tagged With: Measure P, Sonoma County, Sonoma County Deputy Sheriffs Association, timothy-k-talbot, zachery-a-lopes

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.