Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Report offers insight into SFPD disciplinary process

July 12, 2016 by Hien Nguyen

From: San Francisco Chronicle
By Vivian Ho 7/12/16

A panel of retired judges that offered a blueprint for police reforms in San Francisco took special aim at the way officers are investigated and disciplined, citing failures throughout a process that it said should be tougher, more consistent and far more transparent to the public.

The 239-page report by a blue-ribbon panel created by District Attorney George Gascón to look into police bias recommends big changes, including placing the Police Department’s internal affairs division under civilian management and launching an online portal that would allow the public to track investigations of officers every step of the way.

The department, the judges found, rarely intervenes with potentially troubled officers flagged by an early-warning system that monitors their interactions with the public, and the way police leaders sanction officers for bad behavior isn’t tracked or audited in a meaningful way — either by department officials or city regulators.

The report, which offers rare insight into a disciplinary process often shrouded in secrecy, was undertaken after a profound breakdown: the department’s inability to fire several officers who had exchanged racist and homophobic text messages, because the one-year statute of limitations for such discipline had passed.

Released Monday, the study comes at a critical time as police forces across the country are grappling with demands for greater accountability and transparency. The panel of judges, and outside experts, say a strong system of discipline and oversight is needed to set a strong cultural standard for police officers.

Changing behavior

“Inadequate discipline is tantamount to no discipline, in that discipline has to be adequate in order to change behavior,” said Roger Clark, a police procedures consultant and former lieutenant with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, who was not involved in the San Francisco report.

Police officials, who are now acting under the command of interim Chief Toney Chaplin, did not respond to questions about the report, but said they would analyze it in coming weeks and forward it to the U.S. Department of Justice, which is conducting its own top-to-bottom review of the San Francisco force.

Harry Stern, a Bay Area attorney who represents police officers, said the report had a “fundamental flaw” — a focus on meting out severe discipline that he called a “body count” mentality. Like the union representing rank-and-file officers, he called the report — prepared by the judges and an array of local law firms that volunteered their time — a political move by Gascón, a former city police chief.

“George Gascón was never an effective police chief, and so he focuses on punishment instead of a fair process,” Stern said. “The result is a political press release, not a path toward improving the San Francisco Police Department and, in turn, making for a safer city.”

Investigation steps

In San Francisco, officers are investigated by the internal affairs division or the civilian Office of Citizen Complaints, or both. Cases are forwarded to the police chief, who can seek discipline up to a 10-day suspension. If the chief believes an officer requires more severe discipline or termination, he can forward the case to the Police Commission.

According to the report, the internal affairs division does not track its cases in a way that would allow the public to understand how it does its job.

Internal affairs “publishes no statistics about the number and types of cases it investigates, the percentage of complaints that are sustained, or any factual summaries of the complaints it investigates,” the report states. “When the Panel requested that the SFPD provide it with the number of bias complaints investigated or sustained over the last five years, the SFPD could not respond to the request because it did not track this data.”

The lack of information, the report says, “suggests a lack of self-evaluation.” In addition, the report found, no one has audited internal affairs in years.

The report says the department’s disciplinary guidelines haven’t been updated since 1994. While the judges said the Police Commission was effective in many ways, they found that commissioners don’t rely on any formal policies when handing down discipline. And the commissioners do not scrutinize why some cases are disposed of earlier in the process.

The panel was also critical of the Police Department’s early intervention system, which uses a point system to flag officers who, for example, repeatedly use force or become the subject of citizen complaints.

In 2015, there were 307 alerts among 156 officers, with two having eight or more and 15 with five or more alerts. Only nine officers received an intervention, the panel found.

‘Proactive cops’

Stern, the police lawyer, said the system was “set up to ensnare proactive cops, those who take crime fighting seriously.”

The blue-ribbon panel concluded that the Office of Citizen Complaints rarely recommended serious discipline. Not a single investigation of an officer that originated with the office has resulted in more than a 10-day suspension since 2012, the report says.

From 2013 through 2015, there were 1,920 total complaints to the civilian office. In 147 cases, some form of discipline was imposed — or 8 percent. Nine complaints resulted in a suspension.

“These statistics are troubling and raise questions about whether officers are being held accountable to the citizens they serve,” the panel wrote.

The report said the Office of Citizen Complaints had improved under new leadership since a scathing audit in 2007, but that it still moves too slowly and needs more resources. It takes more than nine months, on average, to close a case. With a $5.1 million annual budget for 35 employees, the average caseload per investigator last year was 27 cases, even though the 2007 audit said it should be no more than 16.

Director’s response

The office’s director, Joyce Hicks, said Tuesday that she was still making her way through the report, but took the critiques to heart. She said her office received a bump in the budget for the next fiscal year, and just hired three more senior investigators. She said she also hired a staff attorney to “look at operations and look at the findings in this report to make recommendations for how we can be more effective.”

“I want the OCC to be the best it can be to serve the public,” she said. “With the adequate resources in place, we can do that.”

She said her office had referred a case to the Police Commission for discipline in December, but the officer retired before it could be adjudicated.

Hicks and Police Commission President Suzy Loftus said the panel’s findings were unsurprising — both had worked with the panel during its investigation.

“Some of the recommendations we’ve already moved towards, and I think they came from some of the things the commissioners shared with them,” Loftus said. “Any good idea in any of this, we’re happy to look at. Any good idea can be considered.”

Filed Under: RLS In The News Tagged With: harry-s-stern

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.