Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Post-Interrogations Discovery Rights

October 12, 2020 by Hien Nguyen

When ordered to appear for an internal affairs interview as a subject officer, it is never a level playing field. Subject officers are usually interviewed last, meaning the investigator already knows what witnesses have said, what the videos purport to reveal, and what the complainant has claimed. Many employing agencies do not allow officers access to anything to refresh their recollection prior to an interview, or, what access agencies do allow is not sufficient to paint a full picture as to what transpired in a given incident.

However, officers should be aware that they are entitled to significant discovery rights if they are compelled to attend a second, subsequent interrogation. In Santa Ana Police Officers Association v. City of Santa Ana (2017) 13 Cal.App.5th 317, the court of appeal held that after an officer has been interrogated by their department, Government Code section 3303(g) requires that they be provided with “all reports and complaints concerning the alleged misconduct” prior to any subsequent interrogation.

It is important for officers to assert this right prior to a subsequent interrogation, as the term “reports and complaints” has been given an expansive definition. In San Diego Police Officers Association v. City of San Diego (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 779, the court of appeal held that “reports and complaints” encompass all materials that may contain reports of or complaints concerning the misconduct that is the subject of the investigation. This includes pre-interrogation access to the investigators’ notes or tape-recorded interviews. (Id. at p. 784 [“[t]o the extent that an investigator’s notes or tape-recorded interviews may contain reports or complaints made by other persons concerning the misconduct, [Government Code section 3303(g)] requires their production.”])

Therefore, under Santa Ana, if a subject officer is compelled to attend a second interrogation by their employer for the same administrative investigation, that officer is entitled to receive “all reports and complaints” “concerning the misconduct” in advance of the second interrogation. Thus, prior to the follow-up interview, that officer should demand access to all audio recorded statements of witnesses or fellow subject officers, body camera video germane to the alleged misconduct, surveillance video, the investigator’s notes, any reports concerning the misconduct, and the complaint itself.

The rights and protections afforded under section 3303(g) apply whenever an officer is made to appear for an interrogation that could lead to punitive action by order of their employer, which includes interrogations conducted by local police commissions and civilian review boards. Thus, where an officer has been interviewed by their department, and a police commission or civilian review board seeks to compel another, subsequent statement from the officer concerning the same incident giving rise to the misconduct allegations, that officer has a right to receive the full panoply of post-interrogation discovery discussed in Santa Ana and San Diego.

The rights afforded under section 3303(g) are important, and can greatly assist an officer in refreshing their recollection and otherwise providing greater insight into the often spurious allegations that have been made against them. For these same reasons, this right should be liberally enforced and jealously guarded.

About the author
Justin E. Buffington is a partner with the firm’s Legal Defense Group. He represents clients in criminal and administrative matters, and responds to critical incidents.

Filed Under: Bulletins Prior to RLS Tagged With: justin-e-buffington

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.