Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Police return to hearings

September 19, 2014 by Hien Nguyen

From: Oakland Tribune

By Judith Scherr 9/19/14

BERKELEY — Police officers quietly resumed participation in closed-door Police Review Commission complaint hearings Sept. 10, even though their grievances over a leak of confidential information have not been resolved.

City Manager Christine Daniel allowed officers to stop attending the otherwise mandatory hearings, formally known as Boards of Inquiry, for a 45-day period while the city investigated disclosure of confidential information from a hearing.

The leak was published in May by The Daily Californian newspaper, which did not reveal its sources. Since a 2007 court decision, PRC hearings have been held behind closed doors.

The city investigated the disclosure but came up empty-handed. According to Berkeley Police Association President Chris Stines, PRC staff was thoroughly vetted and the city concluded they weren’t the source of the leak.

However, Stines said they failed to investigate commissioners beyond signed statements they all submitted saying they had no knowledge of the leak. Stines called that insufficient, saying, “No one directly asked them.”

The police officers association wanted to halt mandatory hearing attendance until the source of the leak was resolved. “We’re not looking to prosecute anyone for the crime,” Stines said. “We want to fix this process.”

In a memo to the commission, Daniel said the Alameda County district attorney “informed us of her conclusion that the breach was not a crime.”

In early August, BPA attorneys asked a judge for a temporary restraining order so that officers would not be required to attend hearings until a thorough investigation of commissioners took place.

But Alameda County Superior Court Judge Evelio Grillo turned them down, saying that unless there was evidence showing which individual leaked the information, he wouldn’t stop officers from attending Boards of Inquiry.

Nonetheless, BPA attorneys continue to press theircase in the courts.

Plaintiffs in the case, Officer Gwendolyn Brown and the BPA, want to find the source of the leak. BPA attorney Timothy Talbot of the Rains Lucia Stern law firm told this newspaper that the defendants — the city and the Police Review Commission — breached the 2007 court settlement “requiring the city and the PRC to maintain the confidentiality of the police officer records and of proceedings before the PRC.”

BPA wants “to identify the source of the leak, and get the city and the PRC to take appropriate actions to sanction that individual and prevent this from happening again,” Talbot said.

Through the discovery process, the court can subpoena electronic communications from all who had access to the information, he added.

Plaintiffs are also asking for damages for Officer Brown, contending she was harmed by The Daily Cal’s disclosures.

The newspaper article revealed confidential Board of Inquiry findings, saying that Brown acted improperly by not constantly monitoring the vital signs of Kayla Moore, who died Feb. 12,2013, while in police custody.

The coroner said Moore, who was transgender and schizophrenic, died from obesity, drugs and cardiovascular disease.

City officials declined to comment due to the pending lawsuit.

On Aug. 29, attorneys for the city responded to the complaint in Alameda County Superior Court, arguing that the defendants are not liable for the disclosure “as any individual releasing such information was acting outside the course and scope of employment, was not authorized to release such records and was acting with actual malice to violate the defendants’ rules on confidentiality.”

The city response also says Brown has no reasonable expectation of privacy under the circumstances, since she was “an arresting officer in an in-custody death (that) was public information that had been widely disseminated.”

While not commenting directly on the lawsuit, Alison Bernstein, PRC vice chairwoman, pointed out that, in reaction to the leak, the commission revised its rules around confidentiality, making the nondisclosure requirement more explicit.

 

Filed Under: RLS In The News Tagged With: timothy-k-talbot

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.