Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Personal Injury Vehicle Accident Claim: Former Officer Obtains Judgment Over $1 Million

May 23, 2012 by David Shirley

by Eustace de Saint Phalle, Rains Lucia Stern, PC

In the United States there are approximately 10,000,000 auto accidents with over 30,000 fatalities every year.

Through superior knowledge of accident investigation and medicine, lawyers who handle personal injury matters for RLS obtained the following recovery for a former Oakland PD officer and Alameda County District Attorney Investigator.

Since many in our community are knowledgeable about vehicular accidents and the injuries they cause, we felt this case study might be both interesting and informative for our clients.

Plaintiff, a former OPD officer and Alameda DA investigator, was in three rear end motor vehicle accidents (“MVAs”) in a ten month span: July 24, 2008; April 24, 2009 and May 14, 2009. Plaintiff was in the course and scope of her employment driving a Chevrolet Impala in each MVA, and received workers’ compensation benefits.

After the third MVA, plaintiff was promoted to Lieutenant of Inspectors. Due to upper extremity weakness and tingling in her fingers bilaterally, Plaintiff was forced to take a medical retirement in December 2011.

Plaintiff alleged the three MVAs caused indivisible injuries to her cervical spine requiring career ending cervical arthroplasty at C 4–5 and C 5-6 with need for artificial disk replacement surgery. Thus, plaintiff contended each responsible party was liable for all of her injuries unless they could prove their limited responsibility pursuant to Brown v. Guy, (1956) 144 Cal.App.2d 659, 666 and Katenkamp v. Union Realty Co., (1940) 36 Cal.App.2d 602, 618.

MVA: July 24, 2008

The first Defendant rear ended plaintiff in stop and go traffic approaching the Caldecott Tunnel on East Bound Highway 24 at approximately 8:00 a.m. Plaintiff contended impact speed was 10–12 mph. Damage to her car was $1,300.00. Defendant 1 contended impact speed was 3–5 mph, below the threshold for cervical disk injury. Plaintiff did not report an injury to the investigating officer. Several months later she began treatment for progressively worsening neck pain.

MVA: April 24, 2009

Plaintiff was parked in downtown Oakland outside the main courthouse. The second Defendant hit plaintiff while trying to pull in to a parking space behind her. Plaintiff alleged the impact speed was 3–5 mph. Plaintiff felt immediate exacerbation of neck pain. Defendant 2 did not dispute these assertions.

MVA: May 14, 2009

The third Defendant, in the course and scope of his employment with Acme Press, Inc., struck plaintiff in stop and go traffic on northbound I–680 at approximately 5:00 p.m. just south of Sycamore Valley Blvd. Plaintiff alleged the impact speed was between 8–10 mph. Damage to her car was $380.00. Defendant 3 contended the impact speed was 3–5 mph. Plaintiff reported exacerbation of neck pain to the investigating officer.

Plaintiff did not immediately seek treatment related to the July 24, 2008 accident. In March 2009, plaintiff’s family practitioner referred her for PT for left epicondylitis, an inflammation of the elbow. At physical therapy, the therapist noted possible radicular symptoms from C 5-6 nerve root.

On April 24, 2009, Plaintiff saw her Family Practitioner. Because of her self report of neck pain and the PT note, her doctor made a referral to a physiatrist for nerve conduction velocity and electomyography (“NCV/EMG”). The April 24, 2009, MVA occurred about one hour after this appointment with her doctor.

On May 18, 2009, Plaintiff again saw her doctor. She reported exacerbation of neck pain following the May 14, 2009 MVA.

Throughout the next year, Plaintiff underwent cervical MRI which showed degenerative disc disease in her cervical spine to include desiccation and osteophytes. Initial NCV/EMG was negative for cervical radiculopathy but positive for carpal tunnel. Repeat NCV/EMG a year later was positive for chronic cervical radiculopathy bilaterally. Plaintiff failed conservative treatment which included physical therapy and epidural injection. On March 21, 2011, Plaintiff underwent cervical arthroplasty at C 4–5 and C 5-6 with artificial disk replacement. Surgery was successful. Following surgery, Plaintiff experienced minimal post operative discomfort and regained complete range of motion. She continued to suffer residual hand tingling/numbness.

Damages

During the litigation, plaintiff asserted she suffered from a career ending cervical spine injury that resulted in arthroplasty surgery; that the surgical repair of her spine prevented her from performing her required job tasks including arresting and controlling suspects and arrestees; and that her medical retirement was caused by the injuries from the three accidents. She endured over a year of neck and arm pain from the accidents, but acknowledged an excellent surgical result.

Past medical damages were $98,000. Future claimed medical expenses were: $125,000 for revision surgery.

Wages

Plaintiff suffered past wage loss of $150,000. Plaintiff claimed she would have been promoted to Captain in 2012. She claimed early retirement resulting in future wage loss range of $700,000 -$1,100,000. Defendants argued there was no wage loss and she could return to work.

Defendants’ Arguments

Defendant 1 and Defendant 3 argued plaintiff sustained no more than cervical sprain in each respective accident; the forces involved were insufficient to cause cervical structural injury; plaintiff had pre-existing degenerative condition from high speed work related MVA in 1984 when she was struck by a drunk driver; plaintiff’s cervical spine disease was also due to wear and tear of life including vigorous law enforcement training, participation in athletic endeavors and regular running; and plaintiff was destined for cervical spine surgery irrespective of MVA as she had been intermittently symptomatic for more than a decade with recurrent radicular symptoms.

As to wage loss, defendants claimed plaintiff could return to all required job tasks as Lieutenant of Inspectors since the surgery was a success. Defendants also claimed the possible promotion to Captain was speculative. Finally, defendants introduced evidence and the Court permitted via in limine motions the ability to argue peace officers typically retire with between 25 – 30 years of service. As plaintiff had 27 years experience, they argued any wage loss was limited to at most three years or $450,000.

Result

On the second day of trial, plaintiff accepted $700,000 from Defendant 3. On the third day of trial, plaintiff accepted $75,000 from Defendant 1. Plaintiff proceeded to Judgment against Defendant 2, receiving $1,700,000. After reduction for pre-trial settlements and based upon an apportionment of fault of 15% on Defendant 2, plaintiff obtained a Judgment for $767,357.50 from Defendant 2.

Disclaimer: Case law and analysis can change over time. The information in this article is accurate as of the date the article was written and should not constitute legal advice. Always consult with an attorney.

Filed Under: Bulletins Tagged With: eustace-de-saint-phalle

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.