Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Oakland talks break down; layoffs for 80 cops

July 14, 2010 by David Shirley

From: SF Chronicle

Matthai Kuruvila, 7/14/10

Oakland laid off 80 police officers Tuesday after negotiations between city officials and union leaders failed on one simple matter: job security.

The police union demanded that the city guarantee that its officers would not be laid off for three years in exchange for giving up some pension benefits that would have eased the city’s budget problems.

City leaders, however, said it would have been irresponsible of them to agree to protect police jobs for more than one year because the city’s budget problems are likely to worsen.

The layoffs are believed to be the first for Oakland police officers in at least three decades. Oakland officers warned that the layoffs would imperil the city, which has California’s highest violent crime rate.

“Every time you lay us off, there’s a gun to the citizen’s head as well,” said Sgt. Dom Arotzarena, president of the Oakland Police Officers Association.

He compared the slaying of four officers in the line of duty in March 2009 to Tuesday’s layoffs, saying the 80 were released “not by the hand of a gun, but by the hand of a pen.”

Oakland Council President Jane Brunner said the city had little choice but to order the layoffs.

“We all agree we need more police, but we can’t afford it,” she said.

The police had agreed to several council requests: paying 9 percent of their salaries into their pension plans and agreeing to a later retirement age for new hires. But in return, they wanted a three-year moratorium on officer layoffs.

Counteroffers rejected

The council counter-offered by saying it would agree to a one-year moratorium. But the union said no. The union also rejected an offer from the city for smaller pension contributions with the one-year moratorium.

The city has already eliminated the $42 million deficit it faced for the year that began July 1. Cuts included the police layoffs. The city now has a $407 million budget.

Next year, the deficit is projected at roughly $50 million.

With 75 percent of the budget devoted to police and fire and 10 percent to debt service, the city has no wiggle room, council members said.

In that context, a layoff moratorium just for police “would be irresponsible,” Brunner said.

Union leaders said they have already offered concessions for two years straight even though they have a closed contract. Still, they were willing to negotiate again this year.

“We could have sat on our hands,” said Rocky Lucia, the union’s attorney.

Something in return

Officers who lost their jobs Tuesday said the union could not sacrifice without getting anything back in return.

“My idea of negotiating is giving and getting,” said Chris Peters, who was laid off Tuesday after having worked for nearly two years in North Oakland. “We’re giving, but we’re not getting anything back.”

Councilman Ignacio De La Fuente said other city workers pay at least 9 percent into their pensions and he wanted police to do the same.

Officers currently pay nothing into their pensions. They are allowed to retire at age 50 and collect 3 percent of their salary for every year of service.

“I’m disappointed because I think it’s just fair for them to pay their contribution,” De La Fuente said. “They put the interest of a few at the expense of the people who are going to be laid off. It’s putting us and other cities out of business.”

De La Fuente did not view the pension contribution as a pay cut.

“It’s a very generous pension,” he said. “The least you can do is protect it and make sure it stays viable. … It’s something that very few people in this city and state have.”

Going to voters

The layoffs leave the department with 695 officers. Unless the city and union come to a new agreement, the only hope for restoring the city’s police force lies with voters.

Brunner and union officials talked about working hand-in-hand to convince voters to approve two ballot measures, neither of which has yet been written. The measures – one of which would ask for a parcel tax of about $360 per home to raise an estimated $50 million – could allow the city to rehire the laid-off officers.

A parcel tax would require a two-thirds majority of voters, a threshold that many believe would require the unanimous support of the council and a lack of organized opposition.

Despite the lack of success in negotiations, Lucia, the union attorney, said there was no antagonism toward the council. And the ballot measures are key to restoring the 80 jobs.

“We’re not going to let these guys go without a fight,” Lucia said.

But they won’t be joined in the campaign by De La Fuente, who reiterated what he has been saying for months.

Unless police contribute 9 percent to their pensions, he said, “I will not support the ballot measure.”

Filed Under: RLS In The News

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.