Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Oakland Police Union Fights Potential Discipline of 3 Officers in Court

January 18, 2019 by Hien Nguyen

From: SF Chronicle
By: Megan Cassidy, Jan. 17th, 2019

Oakland’s police union is asking a judge to block the city from disciplining three officers accused of misconduct, because a citizens’ oversight agency allegedly violated state law during a recent probe.

The Community Police Review Agency, or CPRA, unlawfully interrogated four officers by declining to first provide the officers with records of allegations against them, the Oakland Police Officers’ Association claims.

The police union made the allegation in a petition filed last week in Alameda County Superior Court.

The Community Police Review Agency is overseen by the Oakland Police Commission, which is run by the city.

The petition stems from an unspecified Dec. 12, 2017, incident that prompted internal investigations against four officers, according to the court filing, which did not disclose their names. The department fully exonerated the four on July 1, 2018.

Nearly three months later, though, the review agency notified the officers they would undergo a second round of interviews related to the same incident.

An attorney for the officers subsequently wrote a letter to the review agency demanding they “turn over all materials containing notes, complaints or reports concerning the alleged misconduct prior to any further interrogation…”

State law requires this disclosure whenever an employer conducts follow-up interviews into an officers’ alleged misconduct, the court filing argues.

Anthony Finnell, the review agency’s former interim executive director, ultimately denied the request, and the agency re-interviewed all four officers in mid-November. Finnell declined comment for this story.

The review agency later moved to “advance disciplinary proceedings” against three of the four officers, the union petition states, “based, in whole or in part, on the second interrogations conducted in violation of POBR (the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act).”

For this reason, union attorney Jonathan Murphy said, a court should order a stop to the disciplinary proceedings.

Murphy also asked the judge to order the destruction of all records of the “unlawful” interrogations, and to award $25,000 to each of the four officers involved.

“We want the investigating agency to follow state law,” police union President Barry Donelan said in a recent interview. “The law is very straightforward.”

Representatives from the city attorney’s office and Community Police Review Agency did not respond to requests for comment.

The filings provide no details about the alleged misconduct or underlying incident, as such information is shielded from the public record.

The review agency can recommend disciplinary action against the officers to Oakland Police Chief Anne Kirkpatrick but can’t impose it, said Henry Gage, an attorney and activist with the Coalition for Police Accountability.

Additionally, the review agency is restricted from discussing its work due to California’s police privacy laws.

“When I talk to CPRA staff, they’re often very proud of the work they do,” Gage said. “But they can’t talk about any of it. It’s kind of ridiculous.”

For years California has maintained some of the nation’s most secretive laws on police misconduct files. A recently enacted law, however, aims to shed light on decades of hidden records, requiring that some internal documents involving officers’ use of deadly force, sexual misconduct and dishonesty be made public.

Records involving sexual misconduct and dishonesty can be disclosed, however, only if the findings are sustained.

Gage, whose organization advocates for more police transparency, said strict privacy laws fracture the community’s trust with the officers sworn to protect them.

“With all the secrecy surrounding police personnel files,” he said, “all we’re left with is, ‘Trust me, we’re handling this.’”

Filed Under: RLS In The News Tagged With: jonathan-murphy

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.