Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Major changes urged for Oakland police

May 3, 2013 by Hien Nguyen

From: SF Chronicle

Matthai Kuruvila, 05/03/13

The court-appointed overseer of the Oakland Police Department has prescribed sweeping changes, including at least $1.8 million in training and equipment to strengthen the force and bring it into compliance with decade-old reform requirements.

Thomas Frazier, who was appointed compliance director in March, believes the changes will allow the department to emerge from federal court oversight and transform it into one that practices constitutional policing.

Central to Oakland’s problems, Frazier writes in his 59-page report, is a department leadership that fails to supervise its officers and discipline them when they break rules – problems he says sustain a culture tolerant of abuse.

“Executive leadership must send a clear message to the rank and file that misconduct by one reflects poorly on all,” Frazier wrote in his plan, in which he outlines training as part of the solution to changing the culture.

The report is Frazier’s first official statement on how he wants to bring the department into compliance with court-ordered reforms imposed in the wake of a police abuse scandal in 2000 known as the Riders case. Three Oakland officers were tried on criminal charges that included obstruction of justice, assault, kidnapping and filing false police reports. But they were never convicted; a jury acquitted one of all charges and juries deadlocked on charges involving the other two. A fourth officer fled to Mexico and remains a fugitive.

As part of a $10.5 million settlement with 119 plaintiffs in a federal civil rights lawsuit stemming from the Riders case, the city agreed to court oversight on various systemic issues within the department.

Attorneys pleased

The plaintiffs’ attorneys in the lawsuit settlement have remained heavily involved in the court oversight of Oakland police and said they were pleased by Frazier’s assessment.

“He has exactly defined the problems that have led us to 10 years of this,” said Jim Chanin. “The people at the top have not been adequately supervised or disciplined for failing to do their job as supervisors.”

City officials declined comment on various details, but did issue a statement.

Oakland police officers have long complained about the department’s woeful technology and the City Council’s failure to fund it.

“This action plan will help us build on that progress and accelerate our work toward achieving full compliance,” said Mayor Jean Quan, Police Chief Howard Jordan and City Administrator Deanna Santana.

Sean Maher, a spokesman for Quan, said the city does not object to paying for the items Frazier wants. The only question is the order and timing of the expenditures.

Plan’s line items

Frazier has power to spend $250,000 unilaterally, and each of the individual items in his action plan totaled less than that amount. Some did not have cost estimates.

The expenditures Frazier plans include:

— The hiring of outside experts for issues including use of force, racial profiling, technology and personnel management.

— Training for internal affairs investigators, captains, lieutenants and “future leaders” within the department.

— Equipment costs, such as Tasers, to fully equip the police force, better laptops in patrol cars, radio-system repairs, better fingerprint technology and new crowd control weapons.

The expenses hint at the breadth of Frazier’s role. He’s arguably the most powerful figure in Oakland policing because of his court-sanctioned powers to direct the city administrator, demote deputy chief and even seek the firing of the police chief.

Broad latitude

Many of the technology items in Frazier’s plan, like police radios or patrol car laptops, are not specifically mentioned in the settlement agreement. But U.S. District Court Judge Thelton Henderson has given broad latitude to Frazier, who acknowledged in his report that his plan goes well beyond the scope of the agreement and seeks to strengthen the department and set it on a course to success.

Many rank-and-file officers have complained of the department’s woeful technology and the City Council’s failure to fund it. Now, the city will be forced to address the technology issue.

“Somebody needs to make law enforcement and public safety a priority in Oakland,” said Rocky Lucia, an attorney for the Oakland Police Officers Association. “The compliance director is doing that, and it’s refreshing to see.”

Sustainable changes

John Burris, one of two plaintiffs’ attorneys involved in the case, said the various purchases Frazier wants for the department seemed to make sense.

The outside experts Frazier wants to hire would address long-standing issues, such as a warning system to identify officers repeatedly accused of using excessive force.

“The things he’s asking for are not unreasonable,” Burris said. “You want to get into compliance, but you want to get into compliance in a way that these changes are sustainable.”

Chanin, the other plaintiffs’ attorney, who has lived in Oakland for more than 30 years, questioned whether the increase in Police Department spending would cut away from other city services, including parks, libraries, city infrastructure and even more police officers.

“I’m a homeowner,” he said. “I’m acutely aware of the fact that Oakland does not have a lot of money. If they’re talking about spending large sums of money on Tasers and not enough money for core issues, then I’m opposed. As a citizen.”

Filed Under: RLS In The News Tagged With: rockne-a-lucia-jr

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.