Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Limited First Amendment Rights of Public Employees

August 14, 2012 by David Shirley

Rains Lucia Stern partners Mike Rains and Harry Stern scored a victory in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals this week in a very interesting case involving a lawsuit filed by a former officer named Angelo Dahlia. Dahlia sued as a result of claims of brutality and a cover-up during the investigation of a takeover robbery of the beloved Burbank bakery, Portos.

Mike and Harry were hired by the City of Burbank to represent Burbank Police Department Sergeant Edgar Penaranda. Dahlia sued Sgt. Penaranda, the City, the Chief of Police and a host of his other former colleagues alleging that they violated his First Amendment rights when he was placed on administrative leave after making some very serious and inflammatory claims about the conduct of his brethren at Burbank PD. For example, he alleged that when the Chief of Police learned that the suspects were still outstanding he exhorted his detectives to “beat another one until they are all in custody.” Frankly, Dahlia’s claims had the ring of someone who had watched too many episodes of “The Wire.”

A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit grudgingly upheld the Federal District Court’s grant of a motion to dismiss the case based on the Ninth’s prior holding in Huppert v. City of Pittsburg, 574 F.3d 696 (9th Cir. 2009). Under a line of U.S. Supreme Court cases culminating in Garcetti v. Ceballos, (2006) 547 U.S. 410, 421-22 it is fairly difficult for a public employee to obtain First Amendment protection.

The following five “tests” comprise the analysis: (1) whether the plaintiff spoke on a matter of public concern; (2) whether the plaintiff spoke as a private citizen or public employee; (3) whether the plaintiff’s protected speech was a substantial or motivating factor in the adverse employment action; (4) whether the state had an adequate justification for treating the employee differently from other members of the general public; and (5) whether the state would have taken the adverse employment action even absent the protected speech.

The Court in Dahlia opined that they had no choice but to follow the Huppert decision which held that police officers are acting as public employees when they report corruption because it is part of their duty to enforce the law. Huppert itself was based on a 1939 state court ruling that involved a quite different set of circumstances (officers could be terminated for “taking the Fifth” when subpoenaed to a Grand Jury).

Thus the Ninth Circuit ruled that, like Huppert, Dahlia was essentially acting in the course and scope of his job as a police officer when he reported the Portos scandal. Accordingly, he was speaking as a public employee not a private citizen and thus, he failed to meet the legal threshold for making s successful First Amendment violation claim.

The Dahlia opinion offered some excellent dicta regarding the ability of those placed on administrative leave to seek redress. The Court found that being “walked out of the building,” to use police parlance, could well be considered an adverse employment action that is, therefore, actionable.

We were certainly gratified that the Ninth Circuit saw fit to affirm the dismissal of this suit against our client Edgar Penaranda who was falsely accused of serious misconduct (we secured the dismissal of a related state court action against him, as well). Yet, we wonder about the “staying power” of the Huppert decision in light of the Court’s “significant reservations” about its holding as well as the effect of the Huppert (and nowDahlia) case on legitimate criticisms expressed by peace officers about, for example, their corrupt and ineffective department administrations.

Disclaimer: Case law and analysis can change over time. The information in this article is accurate as of the date the article was written and should not constitute legal advice. Always consult with an attorney.

Filed Under: Bulletins Tagged With: harry-s-stern, michael-l-rains

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.