Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

In Oakland, talks over cops’ contract grow tense

June 18, 2009 by David Shirley

From: Oakland Tribune

Kelly Rayburn

06/18/09

In March 2008, after a nearly two-year effort between the Oakland Police Department and the police union to reach an agreement on a new labor deal, an arbitrator granted police brass broader management rights in exchange for 4 percent annual pay increases for officers.

Both sides said they were satisfied with the outcome.

Jump ahead 15 months and, with Oakland in the worst financial crisis anyone can remember, that same contract is the source of consternation between the City Council and the Oakland Police Officers Association as the two sides struggle to reach a deal that is agreeable to the union while helping Oakland through its financial straits.

On the one side, City Council members say it’s fair the police officers take the same 10 percent compensation reduction other city employees are expected to take.

On the other, union leaders say they’ve met with the city in good faith, offering to give up their 4 percent raises and offer other givebacks, only to be stymied.

“We understand economics,” said Sgt. Dom Arotzarena, Oakland police union president. “We see what’s going on out there.”

The City Council on Tuesday rejected a deal that, according to the union’s leadership, would have included a two-year extension of the police officers’ contract until July 2012. Officers would have given up the 4 percent raise they are promised in the current contract and gone a second year without a raise as well, the union said. In the third year, salaries would increase 2 percent and then another 2 percent after six months.

Officers would also have taken a lower per-hour rate on overtime and patrol officers would have reduced their workload from 84 hours to 80 hours every two weeks, the union said.

The deal would have also involved settling a long-standing lawsuit filed by officers in 2006 alleging police were consistently unpaid for pre-shift and post-shift activities, including dressing for their shifts.

The settlement would have included what the union called minimum cash payments (mostly for legal fees), while granting vacation to officers who are plaintiffs in the case in lieu of cash. It wasn’t clear how much vacation would have been given.

Rocky Lucia, an attorney representing the officers in the lawsuit, said the case is worth “tens of millions of dollars.” City Attorney John Russo’s office believes it’s worth a fraction of that amount.

Putting the lawsuit aside, union Vice President Sgt. Barry Donelan said the salary giveback and the overtime and shift changes would have saved Oakland more than $10 million in the fiscal year beginning July 1.

Council members interviewed for this story declined to comment on the details of the rejected deal, but strongly disputed the union’s figures.

“All I’m going to say is that it’s absolutely, unequivocally wrong,” said Councilmember Ignacio De La Fuente. “It’s all smoke and mirrors.”

In a way, the union has the upper hand in the current round of talks since their contract gives them 4 percent raises — at a cost of at least $5.6 million to the city — in the next year. But there are hints that council members are ready to play hardball if they don’t get what they want.

“Their contract expires next year,” De La Fuente said. “That means it’s a new ballgame next year. The whole contract will be open.”

Oakland is facing an $83 million general fund budget deficit for the fiscal year beginning July 1. Revenues are projected at $414 million, with expenditures pegged at $497 million.

City officials have said they are close to new deals with three of the city’s unions — SEIU Local 1021, Local 21 of Professional & Technical Engineers and Local 55 of the International Association of Fire Fighters — that would include overall compensation reductions of 10 percent.

“I think we would like to see (the police) step up and provide help that is equivalent or close to equivalent to what the other unions are doing, what the other employees in the city are doing,” said City Council President Jane Brunner (North Oakland).

With so much disagreement on the figures involved, it’s hard to gauge how close the union is to where the City Council wants it to be.

Arotzarena and Donelan said talks about restructuring their contract date back to November of last year. They picked up considerably in May in a series of meetings with City Administrator Dan Lindheim. Lindheim has declined to discuss specifics about what has been proposed.

For a period of a couple of hours Tuesday, it appeared the talks had completely died after the council rejected the union offer in a closed-session meeting.

Arotzarena and Donelan, upset by the decision, drove to City Hall only to be greeted by city negotiator Jon Holtzman.

The two union leaders and Holtzman were joined by City Councilmembers Jean Quan (Montclair-Laurel) and Larry Reid (Elmhurst-East Oakland) and, at certain points, acting police Chief Howard Jordan, for an impromptu discussion on the possibility of a new deal near the front steps of City Hall.

That ended when Brunner chastised Holtzman for holding the discussion with a council meeting in progress. Reid and Quan returned to the dais.

It’s unclear what was discussed, but the City Council will meet again in closed session Tuesday to discuss a number of labor issues, including the police union contract.

Donelan remained unhappy with how things were progressing Thursday afternoon, saying the city had still not produced a formal counter offer. But Reid said he thinks a deal can be reached.

“I think something can in fact be worked out with the OPOA where they give something back just like all the other unions who have stepped up to the plate during this very difficult time,” he said.

Filed Under: RLS In The News

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.