Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Illegally Obtained Drug Tests Results Ordered Sealed

July 18, 2017 by Hien Nguyen

From: The LDF Report
By: PORAC LDF Fund

On Feb. 13, 1997, Robert Wexler, of Silver, Hadden & Silver, argued in Superior Court that the Riverside Police Department had illegally ordered two of its officers to provide a urine sample following the death of a prisoner who was in the department’s custody, and asked that the results of the drug test performed on those illegally obtained samples be kept from the department. The Superior Court agreed.

On Jan. 28, 1997, a Riverside police officer was in foot pursuit of a narcotics suspect. The officer eventually apprehended the suspect and a physical altercation ensued during which the officer request assistance over his portable radio.

IN RESPONSE TO this request, additional law enforcement officers responded. Shortly thereafter, the suspect went into full cardiac arrest and all attempts by dispatched paramedic personnel to revive him were unsuccessful.

In the hours that followed, each of the officers who responded to the scene, whether they made contact with the suspect or not, were asked to make a voluntary statement to detectives conducting the criminal investigation of the incident.

At the conclusion of their respective interviews, each officer was asked to furnish a voluntary blood or urine sample. Only three of the five officers provided voluntary samples; the other two refused.

Upon their refusal, the two officers were eventually ordered by the department to furnish a blood or urine sample or be subject to discipline, including possible termination. The purported authority upon which the department’s order was premised was a 1996 version of Section 4.8 of their Policy and Procedure Manual.

AT THE TIME that the orders were given, attorney Wexler, who was present to represent the involved officers during the investigation, advised officials from the Police Department and a representative from the Riverside City Attorney’s office that the order to provide a blood/urine sample was unlawful.

Wexler advised the city’s official that the department never met and conferred in good faith with the Riverside Police Officers’ Association prior to adopting the 1996 policy.

MMBA provides that a public employer may not unilaterally after a term or condition of employment that is within the scope of representation of an employee organization without first exhausting fully its statutory obligation to meet and confer in good faith with the recognized employee organization, including participation in all applicable impasse procedures.

The department had negotiated with the association regarding the adoption of the predecessor, 1995 version of Section 4.8, but never consulted the association about the the amendments contained in the 1996 version.

UNDER THE PROVISIONS of the 1995 policy, only an officer that discharged his/her firearm could be ordered to provide a blood or urine sample. In contrast, the unilaterally adopted 1996 policy expands the scope to provide that any employee may be properly subject to an order requiring a blood or urine sample.

On Feb. 10, 1997, after several attempts to persuade the city to destroy the illegally obtained urine samples, the decision was made to seek injunctive relief. Attorneys Wexler and Kenneth Yuwiler worked through the night to file the necessary paperwork in order to obtain a Temporary Restraining Order against the City of Riverside and its police chief, Kenneth Fortier.

In court, Wexler stressed the illegality of the department’s conduct and the irreparable harm that would occur to the two officers’ careers if the department were permitted access to the illegal results. Judge Stephen D. Cunnison granted the request for a Temporary Restraining Order and ordered that the test results be sealed and turned over to him as soon as they are completed.

On March 5, Judge Cunnison will decide whether to keep the blood test results under seal or whether the department’s brass will be given access to them.

The Riverside Police Officers’ Association issued a press release following the judge’s decision, in which it made clear its concern and support for the safely of all citizens of Riverside and its support for the highest professional standards of its members.

The association was troubled, however, by the department’s knowing disregard of its members’ constitutional and statutory rights and urged that future investigations be undertaken within a framework that acknowledges and respects those rights.

According to Wexler, the department is not prohibited from conducting a thorough and complete investigation of any incident. He cautions, however, that such investigations must respect the constitutional rights of all citizens, including police officers.

Filed Under: News Prior to RLS Tagged With: robert-m-wexler

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.