Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

If Demoted, Lawyer Up and Fight to Protect Your Career

July 12, 2011 by David Shirley

by Harry Stern, Rains Lucia Stern, PC, Managing Partner

The Mendocino County Civil Service Commission reversed Sergeant Derek Scott’s demotion to Deputy II, citing excessive discipline, after Scott allegedly failed to supervise two senior deputies in a minor use of force incident.

The Incident

Shortly after midnight on January 13, 2010, Deputies Orell Massey and Derek Paoli of the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) conducted a traffic enforcement stop on a car with a mechanical violation. They found that the driver, Michelle Jackson, was operating the vehicle with a suspended license, and the deputies suspected Jackson to be under the influence of alcohol and a controlled substance. When Jackson refused a Preliminary Alcohol Screening test, Deputies Massey and Paoli placed the suspect under arrest and escorted her back to the MCSO station.

Back at the station, Deputy Massey conducted a narcotic evaluation, noting objective symptoms of stimulant use. Massey also detected the odor of an alcoholic beverage on Jackson’s person. Jackson, however, refused to submit to a urine test. The deputies then transported the suspect to the Ukiah Valley Medical Center (UVMC) to conduct a blood draw. Once at the medical center, Jackson continued to refuse the procedure, and as a result, was forced onto an examination bed. At this point, Jackson began to physically resist, screaming and kicking, injuring Deputy Massey’s finger.

With the situation escalating and posing a threat to the officers and hospital staff, Deputy Paoli contacted Sergeant Scott, the shift supervisor, to obtain permission to perform a drive stun on Jackson. At the time, Scott was in the process of responding to a robbery. Deputy Paoli advised Scott of the situation: Jackson was combative, refused a blood draw and kicked Deputy Massey. Paoli also expressed concern for the nurse’s safety. Scott granted the officers permission to perform a drive stun.

The officers verbally warned Jackson that she would be tased, but the suspect still refused to cooperate. Paoli removed the cartridge from his taser, placed the end of the taser on Jackson’s stomach over her clothing, and applied an electrical charge. Jackson did not respond to the drive stun and continued to resist the deputies and the nurse. At that time, a 6’ 5”, 300-pound male nurse arrived on scene. Together, the male nurse and Deputies Massey and Paoli restrained Jackson enough so that a second nurse could draw blood. The deputies then transported Jackson to the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office Jail for booking.

Although Jackson did not file a complaint against the officers, nor was she injured during the blood draw, MCSO conducted an investigation. Sheriff Allman concluded that Sergeant Scott failed to properly supervise two deputies during a situation which involved questionable use of force. Scott was demoted to Deputy II and suspended without pay for two weeks.

The Hearing

The hearing took place on August 18, 2010 before all five members of the Civil Service Commission of Mendocino County.

Among the first to testify were those present during the incident. Both Deputies Massey and Paoli confirmed Jackson’s refusal of preliminary drug screening procedures and her physical resistance to the blood draw at the UVMC. The nurse that attempted to draw blood from Jackson followed the deputies. She corroborated their testimony, noting that Jackson was out of control. The nurse added that she feared Jackson would kick and injure her while drawing blood.

Sheriff Allman, who imposed Scott’s discipline, also testified. He noted four reasons for Sergeant Scott’s demotion: first, Scott did not attempt to better understand the situation at the UVMC when Paoli called; second, Scott failed to go to the medical center before approving the use of a taser; third, Scott failed to properly reference the audio recording in the crime report; and finally, Scott lodged the audio recording twelve days after the incident. In a contradictory statement, however, Allman stated that he hoped Scott would reapply for any Sergeant positions which became available in the future.

In my closing, taking all the testimony into account, I argued that Scott had not been negligent in his supervisorial role. At the time of the incident, Scott was responding to a burglary. If Scott had left and gone to the UVMC, three of four deputies on duty that night in the Ukiah Valley would have been responding to the matter. The sergeant trusted his deputies and had already received all information needed from Deputy Paoli to make a decision. Moreover, Scott’s absence of prior misconduct, as well as his positive character and performance evaluations, should preclude such harsh disciplinary action. Finally, Deputy Massey’s and Deputy Paoli’s use of the taser fell within constitutional bounds.

The Commission reversed in part and modified in part Sheriff Allman’s decision. The Commission found that Scott did not willfully fail to exercise adequate judgment, but rather made a good faith effort to exercise reasonable judgment. Additionally, the Commission noted that Scott was in the process of investigating a crime and would have had to terminate his investigation to go to the UVMC. Scott should have, however, reviewed crime report more thoroughly. The Commission called Scott’s demotion to Deputy “excessive discipline,” reinstating him to Sergeant.

Sergeant Scott was of course, pleased to be reinstated to his former position. Scott exercised reasonable judgment throughout the incident and only wanted fair treatment. Scott was greatly appreciative of the assistance of Rains Lucia Stern and LDF.

Disclaimer: Case law and analysis can change over time. The information in this article is accurate as of the date the article was written and should not constitute legal advice. Always consult with an attorney.

Filed Under: Bulletins Tagged With: harry-s-stern

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.