Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Demystifying Qualified Immunity

June 22, 2020 by Hien Nguyen

Printer-friendly download

Demystifying Qualified Immunity

Many of our peace officer clients and their families have become increasingly concerned about the public debate over “qualified immunity” and how that legal theory impacts them personally. This Q&A is intended to shed some light on the subject and provide insights into its application.

 

Q: What is qualified immunity?

A: Qualified immunity is a legal principle that provides protection for certain public employees against claims for damages in civil rights cases and can provide grounds for early dismissal from litigation when the public employee is sued.

 

Q: What was the purpose for the creation of qualified immunity?

A: The purpose of qualified immunity is to facilitate a balance between the interest in preventing, and compensating for, constitutional violations, and the recognition that government officials and employees are required to make prompt discretionary decisions.

 

Q: Are peace officers entitled to qualified immunity?

A: Yes. The application of qualified immunity in the context of the law enforcement profession is made to avoid officers being second-guessed in tense and difficult situations, and in those situations where they need to make split-second discretionary decisions. Peace officers are entitled to qualified immunity in civil rights litigation seeking damages under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 where the officer’s conduct does not violate “clearly established” statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable officer would have known.

 

Q: Is there a statute that created qualified immunity?

A: No. There is no statute that provides the right to qualified immunity. Rather, it is a legal precept created by the U.S. Supreme Court in recognition that permitting damages suits against government officials can entail substantial social costs, including the risk that fear of personal monetary liability and harassing litigation will unduly inhibit officials in the discharge of their duties.

 

Q: Does qualified immunity protect peace officers from liability for unlawful or criminal misconduct?

A: No. The limited protection of qualified immunity applies only in the context of civil litigation, and solely in those cases in which an officer’s conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable officer would have known. Qualified immunity does not afford police officers, deputy sheriffs and other law enforcement personnel protection from criminal prosecution or administrative actions.

 

Q: Who decides if qualified immunity applies in any particular case?

A:  The existence of qualified immunity from a civil rights claim is a question of law for the court, rather than a question of fact for the jury.

 

Q: When does qualified immunity come into play?

A: Qualified immunity would typically be asserted as a defense by a peace officer following the commencement of a civil rights lawsuit alleging a violation of a federal or constitutional right arising from improper or excessive use of force, false arrest, unlawful detention, destruction of evidence or improper search and seizure.

 

Q: How can the doctrine of qualified immunity be changed?

A: The elimination or modification of qualified immunity can be accomplished by Congressional legislation or by changes in current case law by the United States Supreme Court in future decisions.

 

Q: Can a local public employer such as a county, city or district change the application of qualified immunity for their employees?

A: No.

 

Q: Is qualified immunity a benefit provided exclusively to peace officers?

A: No. Qualified immunity extends to government officials and employees performing discretionary functions, including mayors, council members, city managers, county administrators, and department heads (including police chiefs) and school teachers.

 

Q: Does qualified immunity affect decisions to discipline employees?

A: No. Qualified immunity only applies to court cases filed against public employees seeking damages for violations of civil rights.

 

Q: Does the dismissal of an officer from a lawsuit on the grounds of qualified immunity mean that an injured person is unable to recover any damages for excessive force by the officer?

A: No. Since the public employer is responsible for hiring, training, and supervising the individual police officer, the employer can be held liable and be required to pay any compensatory damages resulting from an adverse judgment.

 

Q: Without qualified immunity, could personal assets of an employee be subject to garnishment or attachment?

A: Even without the application of qualified immunity, personal assets of an employee cannot be subject to collection proceedings unless the employee does not prevail at trial (or fails to prevail due to Summary Judgment), and fails to win on appeal. In addition, under current California law, the public employer must indemnify the public employee for any adverse judgment or settlement of the case (subject to the exception addressed below).

 

Q: How does qualified immunity affect the legal obligation of my employer to defend and indemnify me for actions taken in the course and scope of my employment?

A: Irrespective of any qualified immunity, pursuant to California Government Code sections 825 et seq. and 995 et seq. the public employer must defend and indemnify its employees for any adverse judgment or settlement against the employee which arises out of any act or omission in the course of employment. However, pursuant to section 825, the employer is not legally obligated to, but may, pay that part of a judgment that is for punitive damages under specified conditions.

 

Q: Is qualified immunity unique to public service?

A: While the doctrine of “qualified immunity” is unique to public service (i.e., government), a similar principle applies in the private sector as well. The doctrine of respondeat superior provides that an employer is subject to liability for injuries caused by an employee's actions resulting or arising from pursuit of the employer's interests.

 

Q: Are legislators and prosecutors entitled to greater immunity than peace officers in civil rights actions?

A: Yes. Absolute immunity is accorded to legislators while acting in the course of their official duties. In addition, prosecutors are entitled to absolute immunity from civil rights lawsuits regarding those actions that are an integral part of the judicial process or that are intimately associated with the judicial process.

Disclaimer: Case law and analysis can change over time. The information in this article is accurate as of the date the article was written and should not constitute legal advice. Always consult with an attorney.

Filed Under: Bulletins Tagged With: eustace-de-saint-phalle, Gidian-R-Mellk, harry-s-stern, Ken Yuwiler, michael-l-rains, peter-hoffmann, richard-a-levine, rockne-a-lucia-jr

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.