Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Court of Appeal Undercuts Legal Protections For Public Employee Pensions

September 20, 2016 by Hien Nguyen

On August 17, 2016, the First Appellate District Court of California published an opinion that threatens to destroy the ability of public employees to protect their pensions. For decades, a pillar of this state’s pension law has been that once an employee accepts and begins employment under a promised pension benefit, that promised pension could not subsequently be reduced without an offsetting “comparable new advantage” given to the employee. In other words, the pension promised to you when hired is the pension you are entitled to receive if you satisfy all the required criteria for receiving the pension by, for example, working the required number of years for your employer.

In Marin Association of Public Employees, et al. v. Marin County Employees’ Retirement Association, et al. (“Marin”), the court of appeal explicitly disposed of this long-standing requirement of a “comparable new advantage.” Marin considered whether the Public Employee Pension Reform Act’s (“PEPRA”) exclusion of various items of compensation from pension calculations, which resulted in a lower pension benefit for existing employees, constituted an unlawful violation of those employees’ “vested” pension rights because no “comparable new advantage” was provided to offset the reductions. The Marin employees argued that because no “comparable new advantage” was given, the reductions to their pensions was unlawful. The Marin court, however, inexplicably found that the “comparable new advantage” requirement was a myth, because prior statements by the California Supreme Court that a reduction in pension benefits “must” be accompanied by a “comparable new advantage” have been mistakenly understood to impose a legal requirement. According to the Marin court, the “comparable new advantage” is merely a suggestion, not an enforceable legal right. Therefore, the reduction of the employees’ pension benefits in Marin did not violate their vested rights and was lawful.

For practical purposes, Marin means that pension benefits for active employees may be reduced almost at whim for political expediency with little legal recourse. And, of course, we are sure all our clients understand how politically expedient it can be to reduce public employee pensions. As this law firm has counseled its clients for decades, a bedrock principle of negotiation at the bargaining table was that the employer could take away everything in a new contract except your pension. Now, however, because of Marin that may no longer be the case. Even though Marin considered pensions under the County Employees’ Retirement Law (“CERL”), its analysis and holding apply equally to all public employee pensions in any pension system, including CalPERS or any other city or county system. Because of this, Marin directly impacts every public employee in this state who expects to receive the pension promised to them.

As most of you know, this law firm has proudly been at the forefront in the fight to protect and advance public employee pension rights. We filed the first civil action in the state contesting PEPRA’s reductions to your pensions in the matter of Contra Costa County Deputy Sheriffs’ Assoc. et al. v. CCCERA, and successively obtained injunctive relief halting the implementation of PEPRA for thousands of Contra Costa County public employees. Accordingly, we do not intend to sit idly by with the emergence of this latest threat to your members’ pensions. This law firm intends to submit a letter to the California Supreme Court strongly urging it to consider the matter and overturn Marin, and in the event it does consider the case, permit us to file an amicus curiae brief in support of the employees.

We will keep all of you updated as the matter progresses.

Disclaimer: Case law and analysis can change over time. The information in this article is accurate as of the date the article was written and should not constitute legal advice. Always consult with an attorney.

Filed Under: Bulletins Tagged With: timothy-k-talbot, zachery-a-lopes

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.