Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Confidentiality of Peace Officer Information Jeopardized by Improper Request of Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascon for Brady Officer Information Lists

March 3, 2021 by Hien Nguyen

Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascon has requested local law enforcement agencies in Los Angeles County provide his office with a list of names and serial/employee identification numbers of current and former deputies and police officers who have engaged in acts of “moral turpitude,” including, but not limited to, those with sustained findings of tampering with evidence, misappropriating property, false statements/failure to make statements, family violence, unreasonable force or violating its policy of equality. He has requested that law enforcement departments provide this information to the District Attorney’s Discovery Compliance Unit within the next few weeks. The stated justification for Mr. Gascon’s request is to facilitate the District Attorney’s prosecutorial obligation to learn of any impeachment evidence concerning potential witnesses under Brady v. Maryland.

Although the United States Supreme Court in Brady v. Maryland determined that the prosecution is subject to a constitutional duty to disclose to the defense materially exculpatory evidence, including potential impeachment evidence, the California Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the names of peace officers, when connected or linked with employee discipline and investigation of complaints, are confidential and not subject to disclosure absent a Pitchess motion. (See Copley Press Inc. v. Superior Court (2006) 39 Cal. 4th 1272, 1297; Commission on Peace Officer Standards & Training v. Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal. 4th 278, 295; Long Beach Police Officers Association v. City of Long Beach (2014) 59 Cal. 4th 59, 73.)

No Brady obligation exists for a law enforcement agency to create or produce a list of “Brady Officers” to the District Attorney’s Office or other prosecutorial agency before the institution of a specific criminal case. Moreover, any disclosure of such confidential peace officer information by law enforcement agencies to prosecutors under these circumstances without compliance with the Pitchess procedure would violate Penal Code section 832.7(a) and the well-established statutory and constitutional right of privacy of peace officers in their personnel records. However, it should be noted that Section 832.7(a) would not restrict the disclosure of peace officer records which have recently been identified through SB 1421 as non-confidential (i.e., records involving discharge of a firearm, use of force resulting in death or great bodily injury, sustained finding of engaging in sexual assault of a member of the public, or sustained finding of dishonesty).

Unfortunately, there are several other district attorneys in California who seem to follow the lead of Mr. Gascon on anti-police measures, so we suggest that all of our clients be mindful that this attempt to eviscerate peace officer rights may surface in other counties.

In order to maintain and protect the statutory and constitutional right of privacy of peace officers in their personnel records, we are advising our local law enforcement employee organizations in Los Angeles County to immediately ascertain the position of their respective employing agency as to the pending Brady list request by the District Attorney’s Office. In fact, a number of our association clients are working with our office to take steps to assert legal arguments in opposition to this unlawful request. We urge all of our association clients (especially those in Los Angeles County) to join in the effort by contacting your RLS labor representative.

Disclaimer: Case law and analysis can change over time. The information in this article is accurate as of the date the article was written and should not constitute legal advice. Always consult with an attorney.

Filed Under: Bulletins Tagged With: elizabeth-s-tourgeman, Jacob A Kalinski, richard-a-levine

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.