Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Attorneys request major changes in Oakland Police Department

October 4, 2012 by David Shirley

From: Oakland Tribune

Matthew Artz, 10/04/12

Two prominent civil rights lawyers asked a federal judge Thursday to install a receiver over Oakland’s police department with absolute authority to force through still unmet court-ordered reforms and potentially the power to help pick the next chief.

In a much-anticipated 57-page motion, attorneys John Burris and Jim Chanin argued that nearly 10 years after agreeing to judicial monitoring, Oakland’s police department remains incapable of policing itself on several fronts — including conducting thorough Internal Affairs investigations, tracking the actions of its officers and preventing racial profiling.

Without a receiver to ensure compliance, they wrote, Oakland residents, especially minorities, would face “continued civil rights violations, loss of life and injury.”

U.S. District Court Judge Thelton Henderson has scheduled a hearing on the motion for Dec. 13.

Mayor Jean Quan refused to comment on the motion late Thursday, saying they needed time to consult with their attorneys.

Michael Rains, who represents Oakland’s police union, said the rank-and-file were so frustrated with what they saw as arbitrary discipline from Chief Howard Jordan and department brass that they weren’t necessarily opposed to a receiver.

“There has been an absolute lack of meaningful leadership in the department for the last decade,” he said. “From the standpoint of (the union), the current chief has been an abysmal failure and a massive disappointment.”

The city is expected to vigorously oppose the motion, which would make Oakland the nation’s only city to lose substantial authority over its police department. It has until Nov. 8 to respond to the filing.

Role undefined

The department has been under the eye of a court-appointed federal monitor since a 2003 agreement that settled the Riders’ police corruption case.

Burris and Chanin, who represented the plaintiffs in that case, say the monitor, whose powers are limited, has proven unable to get city leaders to fully implement the reforms.

A receiver, they wrote, “would be able to issue enforceable commands to the city and (police).”

“I don’t see the receiver micromanaging the department; I see them forcing the department to follow the (settlement agreement),” Chanin said.

Chanin said he didn’t think a receiver would be able to break the city’s budget by ordering the hiring of more officers or toss out the police union’s contract.

Ultimately, it would be up to Judge Henderson to define the receiver’s role. Chanin said he thinks the receiver should have input into the chief’s job.

“There is a systemic failure,” he said. “We want to see the highest levels of the police department held accountable.”

Decade of failure

The motion documents what the attorneys say has been a decade of bad faith efforts by multiple police chiefs, city administrators and mayors to fully implement the reforms.

It also argues that rank-and-file officers continue to oppose reform efforts.

Two women gave testimony that officers criticized the court oversight at Citizen Police Academies earlier this year. One said that an officer claimed that Judge Henderson was a member of the Symbionese Liberation Army — a 70s radical group.

The motion references recent blistering reports from the city’s own consultant about the botched response to the first Occupy Oakland protest last October and from the court appointed monitor who found that some officers have shot people who were not imminent threats and that investigators are predisposed to justify those shootings.

The attorneys quote Jordan saying that to some degree Internal Affairs “investigators do not want to be the individual who sustains a complaint against a particular measure.”

The lack of institutional control, the attorneys write, has contributed to the city paying out more than $31 million in police lawsuit awards since 2001.

While they note that receivership is a “drastic measure,” the attorneys wrote that without it, the “organizational dysfunction and lack of leadership will doom the (court-ordered) reforms to failure.”

Regression

The request for a receiver is the culmination of the 1999 Riders police corruption scandal in which four officers were accused of beating up and framing suspects.

The 2003 agreement settling the lawsuit brought by 119 plaintiffs required Oakland police to accept federal monitoring and implement dozens of reforms. The reforms were supposed to have been completed no later than 2010, but the department has struggled with nine tasks and appeared to lose ground over the past year.

In recent reports, the federal monitor has found that officers resort to pointing their guns without justification almost exclusively at black and Latino residents and that they are failing to document people they stop and detain so that supervisors can identify racial profiling trends.

The monitor also warned that the department could fall out of compliance with other reform tasks if it doesn’t take measures to correct mistakes made during the first Occupy Oakland protest last year.

Filed Under: RLS In The News Tagged With: michael-l-rains

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.