Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver

California's premier full-service law firm with an emphasis on the representation of peace officers in disciplinary, criminal, labor, workers' compensation, personal injury and other civil matters.

  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Attorneys Argue Over Scope of Police Records Law Before Appellate Court Panel

January 25, 2021 by Hien Nguyen

From: VC Star
By: Megan Diskin

Attorneys on Thursday made their final arguments to the appellate court tasked with deciding whether a landmark police records law applies to incidents before the law went into effect.

Senate Bill 1421, the law in debate, made certain police misconduct records open to the public as of Jan. 1, 2019. The legislation was passed amid an ongoing discussion about transparency in law enforcement and holding officers accountable.

A three-justice panel out of the 2nd District Court of Appeal listened as attorneys for the Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Association, public defender's office and multiple media outlets, including The Star, discussed whether the law applied to incidents from before 2019.

"I just don’t think there's any plain language in 1421 or (state penal code) 832.7 that there should be retroactivity one way or another and no individuation of an express intent," said Richard Levine, the attorney representing the law enforcement union.

In his oral argument, Levine referenced the penal code that makes peace officer personnel records confidential.

The Star has submitted public records requests for these pre-2019 misconduct records, and investigative records into the officer-involved shooting at the Borderline Bar & Grill in 2018. The Star has also sued the county over withholding the Borderline records in violation of public records laws.

Kelly Aviles, The Star's attorney, also made arguments Thursday before the appellate panel. Aviles also represents the Los Angeles Times and Associated Press in the Borderline lawsuit.

It was the Ventura County Public Defender's Office, however, that intervened when Ventura County Superior Court Judge Henry Walsh issued a court order blocking any pre-2019 records from being released in June 2019.

The public defender's office filed an appeal to overturn Walsh's ruling and vacate his order.

Senior Deputy Public Defender Michael McMahon said there is no conflict between the plain language of the SB 1421. It explicitly states all records in possession of the law enforcement agency are subject to the law, McMahon said.

Moreover, McMahon pointed to a decades-old change to the state constitution that any statute enacted to revise "public access laws has to be interpreted broadly if it expands public access and narrowly if it restricts."

The senior deputy public defender also pointed to a decision in a Contra Costa County case from another appellate district that upheld the law's applicability to pre-2019 records.

Levine, for the union, said that the ruling was decided incorrectly and continued to explain to the local appellate court the privacy rights at stake. Peace officers had privacy rights for these misconduct records before the legislation was passed and the bill took that right away.

Aviles, the media attorney, said that wasn't necessarily accurate. Before the bill was passed, people could file a Pitchess motion to gain access to their personnel records. They would be notified of the request and a judge would look through the file and release any relevant information under protective order, Aviles said.

Under SB 1421, the peace officer is also notified when records regarding their personnel history are requested by the public. They also have an opportunity to get certain information like addresses or private medical information, Aviles said.

If the law enforcement agency fails to redact it, the peace officer could get a lawyer and file a court action.

"Privacy rights must be asserted by the individual," Aviles said.

The appellate court has a few months to issue an opinion on the matter.

Filed Under: RLS In The News Tagged With: richard-a-levine

Consultation Form

Offices across California to serve you.
Contact us now to schedule a consultation.
Contact form not loading? Click here!
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC publishes this website as a service to our clients and other friends for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for specific legal advice or opinions, and the transmission of information through this website is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

© 2023 Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie settingsACCEPTREJECT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Contact Us

  • News Alerts

Official logo for Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver
Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver Logo
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Labor Representation
    • Civil Litigation
    • Personal Injury
      ▼
      • Example of Case Results
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Maritime Law
    • Estate Planning
    • DOE Security Clearance Hearings
    • Peace Officers
    • Firefighters
    • EMS Agency Investigations
    • Criminal Defense
    • CalPERS Appeals
  • Our Team
  • Classes
  • Media
    ▼
    • Bulletins
    • RLS in the News
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Links
    • Resources
    • Newsletters
  • Clients
  • Career Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
Hotline phone numbers. Northern California: 925-609-1699. Southern California: 310-393-1486.