Bulletins


 

Rains Lucia Stern, PC trial attorney Eustace de Saint Phalle and his co-counsel Michael Gatto win a future damage award that exceeds $100,000,000 in a medical malpractice case

Last Thursday afternoon a jury in Contra Costa County returned a verdict in the case of Brian C (a minor) vs. Contra Costa County Health Services, a medical malpractice case concerning negligent management of a twin pregnancy which resulted in the death of one twin and severe brain injury of the other.  The jury determined that the surviving twin would likely live another 74 years, would never be employable, and would need extensive future medical care for the rest of his life for a total future damage award of $111,700,000. [Read more…]

Community Violence Solutions: The Unsung Heroes of the CCC Justice System

From: Contra Costa Lawyer
By Terry Leoni 2/1/15

Community Violence Solutions (CVS) opened its doors in 1974, as the Rape Crisis Clinic of Contra Costa and Marin counties. Although its name has changed since its inception 41 years ago, its mission has remained the same—to support adult and child survivors of sexual assault. It is not only one of the oldest organizations of its kind in California, but also in the country, with staff who works tirelessly to assist those in need after a sexual assault. [Read more…]

Attorneys’ Fees Awarded in a Precedent-Setting Disciplinary Decision

By Sarah Burdick

RLS attorneys Sarah Burdick and Jonathan Murphy handing Dee Dee Lundquist a check for attorneys’ fees awarded against the City of Oakland in the Mausz arbitration.

RLS attorneys Sarah Burdick and Jonathan Murphy handing Dee Dee Lundquist a check for attorneys’ fees awarded against the City of Oakland in arbitration.

A neutral Arbitrator has recently made an unprecedented award in an Oakland POA discipline case.  The Arbitrator awarded full back-pay for a served five-day suspension, plus interest, attorneys’ fees, and fully overturned all sustained allegations in an appeal action against the City of Oakland.  The award of attorneys’ fees (which are not called for in the MOU) were essentially made as a sanction for the City’s conduct. As the Arbitrator explained: [Read more…]

Mob rule by protesters is not the road to justice

From: SFGate
By Harry S. Stern 12/18/14

Nearly two decades ago, the great constitutional scholar George Anastaplo asked me to contribute to a law review article he was writing about the aftermath of O.J. Simpson’s acquittal of murder charges by a jury in Los Angeles. I had something of a unique perspective: I was working as a police officer while a law student. [Read more…]

Mike Rains – To Discuss the Ferguson Grand Jury Results on National Public Radio, “To the Point.” 11/26/14 at 11:10 a.m.

Mike Rains will join three other nationally recognized speakers in a live roundtable discussion regarding the Ferguson Grand Jury results. Hosted by Warren Olney, the discussion will take place on NPR’s “To the Point.” NPR’s member stations will air the show beginning at 11:10 a.m. PT tomorrow, Wednesday, November 26th. The program will last 35 minutes. 

Please click the link to view the list of NPR member stations:

http://www.kcrw.com/about/show-syndication#tothepoint

If a member station is not available in your area, the show will also be available live online. pri.org/live  

California Supreme Court Agrees to Hear (and Hopefully Overturn) Recent Appellate Decision Allowing District Attorneys Direct Access to Peace Officer Personnel Files for Brady Material Review

We are delighted to announce that the California Supreme Court has granted review of the decision handed down by the First Appellate District on August 11, 2014 entitled People v. Superior Court (Daryl Lee Johnson) (2014) 228 Cal.App.4th 1046.

In our opinion, the Court of Appeal decision in this case was a terrible decision which essentially held that District Attorneys could directly access peace officer personnel files to review them to ascertain if there was material contained in the file which needed to be provided to the defense to comply with Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83.

Writing on behalf of the PORAC Legal Defense Fund and all of its members, and the San Francisco Police Officers’ Association (the jurisdiction where this issue arose) and all of its officers, Mike Rains of RLS urged the Supreme Court to grant review of the Johnson decision, arguing that it directly contradicted an 11-year practice to the contrary which had first been decided by the Second District Court of Appeal in People v. Gutierrez (2003) 112 Cal.App.4th 1463.  RLS was joined in urging the Supreme Court to grant review of this decision by Ventura County District Attorney Greg Totten and by Riverside County District Attorney Paul Zellerbach.

In light of the Supreme Court’s decision granting review, the District Attorney “direct access” to peace officer personnel files to conduct Brady discovery examination permitted by Johnson is now on hold.

Mike and RLS are eagerly looking forward to appearing on behalf of PORAC LDF, San Francisco POA, and all of the individual officers represented by these organizations and arguing against the Johnson ruling, which potentially provides Deputy District Attorneys with access to peace officer background investigations, medical records, and other personal information having literally nothing whatsoever to do with issues concerning their credibility as witnesses in a criminal trial.

UBER assault victim hires RLS

RLS managing principal and trial attorney Harry Stern and RLS personal injury litigator Joseph Lucia are representing Roberto Chicas who was the victim of a hammer attack at the hands of an UBER driver in what has been become a highly-publicized incident. The case has garnered national media attention in light of the horrific nature off the injury—the client is in serious danger of losing his eye–and because of the growing controversy concerning UBER’s business model of flooding the streets with untested and untrained drivers while attempting to avoid liability. [Read more…]

RLS Asks the California Supreme Court to Overturn a Dangerous Decision Concerning Brady Discovery

The PORAC Legal Defense Fund and the San Francisco Police Officers’ Association asked RLS and Mike Rains to submit an Amicus Curiae letter to the California Supreme Court, urging the Court to overrule the recent holding of the First District Court of Appeal in People v. Superior Court (Johnson). That decision gave District Attorneys the right to directly access and inspect police officer personnel files pursuant to Penal Code section 832.7 in order to look for Brady discovery.  The potential intrusion into materials which are sensitive and private, and have nothing to do with Brady discovery, is simply too great, and there are less intrusive ways DA’s can satisfy their Brady obligations than rummaging through the personnel files of officers.

Click here to view full letter submitted by Mike.

Federal Jury in San Francisco Clears Former Bart Police Officer Johannes Mehserle of Constitutional Rights Violations in the Fatal Shooting of Oscar Grant III

By Michael Rains, 7/28/14 

Although I am still exhausted from what I call the “Trial from Hell,” I am writing to report a tremendous verdict by a federal jury in San Francisco on July 1st relating to the fatal shooting of Oscar Grant III by our client, former BART Police Officer Johannes Mehserle. [Read more…]

High Court Releases Landmark Cell Phone Privacy Decision

By Steven Betz, 7/7/14

An issue that continues to cause concern, confusion, and anxiety for law enforcement officers, the general public, attorneys, and jurists is to what extent the government can intrude into the data that we all store on our cellular telephones. Since “smart phones” began to see common use in the general public in 2007, the average American carries with him or her voluminous private data in a small device that rarely is beyond arm’s reach. [Read more…]